The Fujifilm platform has been the best place to be to get excellent APS-C lenses of all shapes and sizes. Fuji’s strategy has been to forego the popular 35mm full frame sensor and putting all their eggs into the APS-C basket. They’ve also moved into the Medium Format space with their GFx system, but that is a more niche, specialized space that the average photographer is essentially oblivious to. The APS-C shooters in the Canon, Nikon, and Sony space have typically had to make due with mostly lower tier lenses for APS-C, as the vast majority of the development from these companies is for full frame. Fujifilm shooters, however, have been treated to a fairly significant array of options both commercial grade and premium in and around most popular focal lengths and zoom ranges. Case in point is the lens that we are reviewing today, the Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR hereafter called the XF90 for brevity, which is a premium grade 135mm equivalent telephoto lens at a very popular portrait focal length. I recently reviewed the Fujinon XF 56mm R lens, which serves a role much like an 85mm lens on a full frame 35mm system. The Fuji X-mount cameras have a crop factor of though this is not an entirely accurate figure, as Fuji actually cites the full frame equivalency of the XF90 as 137mm rather than 135mm more like I’ve seen this before when examining their tech specs, so I think this is a general observation about the X system’s crop factor. For all practical purposes, however, we have a 135mmish portrait and telephoto lens…though with a considerably smaller form factor than an equivalent lens for full frame. I’ve done this review on a Fujfilm X-T3 camera body, which means that there is no in body image stabilization. The XF90 does not have OS, unfortunately, so this is going to be a non-stabilized option unless you are using an X-H1 camera or successive bodies after this review than contain IBIS. That is a significant drawback, unfortunately, as 135mm is a long enough focal length to encounter more obvious motion blur. This combines with the reality that 26Mp is very pixel-dense for an APS-C sensor, so motion blur becomes a little more obvious here as well. I mention this because I was occasionally surprised by minor motion blur in some of my images in unexpected situations like shooting at shutter speeds of 1/200th. This is a focal length, frankly, that would have benefited from some kind of stabilization. This isn’t a problem unique to Fuji, per se, but it is part of the reason why I continue to believe that Fujifilm should expand their inclusion of IBIS to more models…including the X-T can see evidence of some motion blur here in this 1/200th shot…and I have steady hands!While I’ve lamented what wasn’t in the XF90, fortunately there are a lot of things that are there, including LM linear motors to drive autofocus, in this case 4!! of them and WR weather resistance, in the form of a gasket at the lens mount along with six other internal seals. This is a premium lens, and both of these were features missing on the XF 56mm that I recently reviewed. But is the XF90 the lens for you? Let’s explore that idea together…Prefer to watch your reviews? Here’s my two part video review series Part 1 covers build, handling, and image quality. Part 2 covers portraits, autofocus performance, video performance, and my conclusionsFollow Me Patreon My Newsletter Instagram Facebook Twitter Flickr 500pxFuji XF90 Build, Handling, and DesignThe XF90 is a very nicely made lens. It features a great form factor. We see the advantage of developing for the smaller sensor in a smaller lens when compared to full frame 135mm lenses. The lens is only x 75 x 105 mm D x L and weighs a moderate lb 540g. That’s roughly 7mm less in diameter and length and 210g less in weight than the Canon EF 135mm F2L lens. The front filter thread is a slightly uncommon 62mm; not every filter maker produces filters in this size, but there are plenty of options out there. The lens balances well on the X-T3 body I used for review. The body is primarily made of metal and has a premium feel to it. I did notice a very slight wobble in the lens mount connection to the camera. The lens has a classic semi-glass black finish to it and is completed with thorough weather sealing as already noted.There are two rings. The closest to the mount is the aperture ring. You have the option to select A and control the aperture from the camera or to physically select your preferred aperture in one-third stop detents. There is no clickless option for the aperture. It should be noted that the aperture ring is a “by-wire” system. Using the aperture ring without the lens attached to the camera and the camera powered on will accomplish nothing. I do prefer having an aperture ring on a lens as I find that it makes the photographer more intentional about aperture selection. If you don’t want to mess with it, just put it in A mode and forget about wide focus ring has nice metal ridges and moves nicely. It to is a “by-wire” ring, and input on the focus ring will be routed through the focus motor to move the elements. The damping is about right, and the ring moves smoothly and precisely. Fuji gives the option of choosing between linear and non-linear focus action, though neither quite imitates true manual focus. Non-linear will allow you to make faster focus changes if you twist the focus ring quickly, but this option lacks repeatability. You’re never quite sure exactly where you’ll end up. Selecting linear allows for more repeatability/predictability, but making major focus changes requires repeated full rotations of the ring and as a result it is difficult to make smooth focus pulls when shooting video. Bottom line is that if you want excellent manual focus, buy a manual focus XF90 has a great looking front facade with lens information on the front. Fuji makes attractive lenses with a wonderfully classic you look through the lens, you will see a lot of glass. An aperture of F2 at this focal length is nice and big!I’m far less enthused about the lens hood. It is a fairly cheap feeling plastic with interior ribs to help block stray light from bouncing around. It has a matte plastic finish that shows marks fairly easily and does not click definitely into place. It’s very easy to rotate loose. The lens hood feels like a cheap misfit on such an otherwise nicely built than this misstep I’m very happy with the build quality and handling of the XF90 Autofocus PerformanceThis section is a little complicated for me, as Fujifilm is one of three mirrorless systems that I spend a lot of time with, and as a result part of my opinions are formed by what I perceive as Fujifilm vulnerabilities when it comes to focus. It’s hard to divorce lens performance from camera performance when it comes to autofocus. Let’s start with what is clearly positive and lens specific. The XF90 has a very powerful quad linear motor focus system. This gives it a clear advantage over a lens like the 56mm in both focus speed and quality of is fast and quiet, though there can sometimes be a micro-pulse or two before focus settles. This shows up when shooting video, too, as while focus pulls are fairly quick and smooth better than most of what I’ve seen on Fuji, there is some minor pulsing before focus settles. What I do see is less obvious stepping than what I see from many Fuji lenses, so there is definitely some evidence that those quad focus motors are doing their job. The focus speed also helps this to be a better lens for stopping action than some of their other medium telephoto are few places where the lens/system fall short, though. The first is that while the lens has a great minimum focus distance and great maximum magnification figure in real-world terms, the lens is very reluctant to focus on a foreground object if focus is not already close. You can set a focus point right on an obvious foreground object, and still the lens will refuse to focus on the foreground object. I had a number of situations in my review period where I had restart the focus process multiple times or try to focus on another midpoint object to start moving focus towards the foreground. On a few occasions it required switching to manual focus and manually pulling focus in the right direction like the shot below. Very annoying. The reason that I don’t blame this entirely on the lens is that I’ve seen a press release regarding a future firmware update for the X-T3 scheduled for January 2020 that included this nugget that caught my eye, “Improving autofocus capability on a foreground subject even when there is a mixture of foreground and background subjects within a frame, causing the foreground subject to go out of focus, when shooting flowers against a busy background.” That sounds very much like what I’ve seen throughout this review, so it seems like this could be more of a camera focus problem than a lens-specific problem. This is probably also true of the second issue which, ironically, may also be addressed in that same firmware update according the press release. I find the Eye AF Pupil Detection to be somewhat less accurate than either Sony’s excellent Eye AF or Canon’s dramatically improved Eye AF after firmware on the EOS R. A lens like the XF90 sports a very shallow depth of field DOF, and I often found that the eyelashes rather than the eye itself would be in the shot below, the lens did not properly focus on the visible eyes because of the coffee mug held in the subject’s hands. I had to override focus to get what I wantedIn many situations the lens focused just fine though, and, with a little effort, I was able to get what I wanted in most all line is that while it feels like there is an effective focus system in the XF90, it is held back somewhat by some areas that Fuji still lags a bit behind some of its XF90 Image Quality BreakdownThere is one thing that Fuji does particularly well, and that is that they really do develop exceptionally good profiles for their lenses. Even RAW files arrive with embedded correction profiles, so you will only ever see an uncorrected image if you turned off the corrections in camera. The byproduct of this is that my brick wall tests are among the cleanest that I ever see, with no vignette or distortion to be seen. I’ll spare you even looking at them you can determine the lack of vignette from the sharpness samples below. It’s not unusual for 135mm lenses to have little to no distortion, but vignette is another matter. The reason I praise Fuji’s corrections as being exceptional is because they produce extremely even results with vignette correction unlike some profiles where the corners are overboosted compared to the remainder of the XF90 produces excellent center results and nearly as good corners even at F2Real world results look great, too. Check out the detail in the fibers of the rope at F2You can see excellent real-world contrast in this imageThe reason for this can be seen in another image, which shows that longitudinal chromatic aberrations are really well controlled. The high contrast transition edges on this statue show no real signs of any fringingStopping the lens down to shows an obvious uptick in contrast, with darker areas looking darker and lighter areas looking lighter and crisperThis trend continues on to F4, where resolution and contrast reach exceptional levels across the frameThe detail in the somewhat distant peninsula is exceptional and a tribute to the flexibility of a lens like this for shooting a variety of and contrast peak at with a fractional regression at F8 and a more noticeable one by F16 due to alluded to previously, the lens has an excellent reproduction ratio, though Fuji kind of obfuscates this by citing two different magnification figures. They cite the APS-C reproduction ratio as and the full frame equivalent of I find this a little silly, as you will only ever see ONE reproduction ratio, and it is the higher figure. Look at how much greater the magnification of the Fuji is than that of the Zeiss Milvus 135mm F2 and its magnification. The close-up performance of the Fuji isn’t as good as the Zeiss…but few lenses are, so I won’t hold that against it. I love having a great magnification on a lens like this; it adds so much versatility to what you can the most practical aspect of this is that you can mostly frame as tight as you like and be creative with your bokeh of the XF90 is very nice, though I wouldn’t characterize it as “magical” in the way that some exceptional telephoto portrait lenses can be the Milvus, for example. The aperture iris has seven rounded blades, though you will start to see their shape with the lens stopped down a bit. The first shot below is wide open; the second is F4, and you can definitely see a few points on the edges of the quality of the background blur at many focus distances is very nice…though there are few situations where it can look a little busyBokeh is a fairly subjective topic, so I’ll just show you some images at varying focus distances and let you be the judge yourselfI would say that in general I think the lens does a good generally find the colors from the lens quite are very nice as wellThe primary vulnerability for the XF90 like many wide aperture primes is some susceptibility to flare. You will have to be careful with either the sun in the frame or a strongly backlit subject with direct lights. The first two images show both artificial light flashlight and the sun in the frame at F2; the third image shows the resulting pattern at F11There’s definitely some veiling loss of contrast at F2 along with some generally undefined ghosting blobs. There is a more defined ghosting pattern at F11, though some might find that artistic. You’ll just either have to be careful or creative in the way that you use flare…as there will definitely be general I’m pleased with the optical performance of the lens. It’s capable of fantastic results, though I wish Eye AF was a little more accurate so that it could show this lens to its best potential. You can definitely take some magical shots with My general impressions of the Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR are more positive than those of the 56mm because the latter lacks an effective autofocus system or weathersealing no LM or WR and yet is the more expensive lens of the two. It delivers a stronger wide open performance as well and was more pleasing to use because of the more modern, sophisticated quality of focus due to the quad linear motors. Both lenses are effective portrait lenses when used to their strengths. But an 85mm equivalent lens 56mm and 135mm 90mm lens are different in kind. While I generally prefer the unique look that 135mm lenses produce they can create a wonderful “cutout” effect for full frame portraits, they are also less many situations a 135mm lens or 90mm on APS-C is generally too long. In a wedding situation, for example, I have found that there were times that I couldn’t step back enough, and my framing felt crowded. So while the Fujinon 90mm is capable of producing more special images and is nicer to use, the 56mm is the more flexible tool. Which lens is better for you might depend on what else you have in your is a nice lens, however, capable of producing beautiful images that you can be proud of, and there is every reason to believe that it will perform even better as Fujifilm continues to tweak their focus systems in their cameras and hopefully adds IBIS to more bodies! I noted that on B&H Photo’s website there is an aggregate 5 star rating with 100 reviews…so people are definitely fans of this lens. This is a very useful tool and may just become the favorite portrait lens in your bag…just make sure you have enough room to use it!ProsVery nice construction complete with thorough weather sealingQuad linear motors provide quick, quiet focusNice sharpness and contrast wide openExceptional sharpness when stopped downGood colorExceptional chromatic aberration controlNice bokehConsLens hood is cheapSometimes won’t focus on foreground subjectsSomewhat flare pronePurchase the Fujinon XF 90mm F2 B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UK Amazon Germany Ebay Purchase the FUJIFilm X-T3 B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UK Amazon Germany EbayPeak Design Slide Lite Peak Design Store B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UKPeak Design Leash Strap Peak Design Store B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UKBenQ SW271 4K Photo Editing Monitor – B&H Photo Amazon Amazon UKAdobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year SubscriptionAlien Skin Exposure X4 Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everythingVisit Dustin’s Amazon Storefront and see his favorite gearPurchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!Check me out on My Patreon Sign Up for My Newsletter Instagram Facebook Twitter Flickr 500px Google+ Use Code “DUSTINHDR” to get $10 off $15 CDN any Skylum product Luminar, Aurora, or AirMagic Keywords Fujinon, Fuji, 90mm, Fuji 90 Review, Fujinon 90mm, 90mm 2, 90 F2, 90mm F2, Fuji 90mm F2 R Review, Fujifilm X-T3, 90mm, F2, 2, FE, XF, Dustin Abbott, Review, Autofocus, Hands On, Video Test, Portrait, Video, Bokeh, Real World, Comparison, VSDISCLAIMER This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
90mmF2 WR: F1.2 R: https://amzn.to/2Ri0h10Fujifilm X-T3: https://amzn.to/2OB3BpPHere is my comparison of these two lenses 56mm F Quick Facts about the Fujifilm 90mm F2 LM WRWeight Grams Weather Sealed YesFilter Size 62mm Angle of View DegreesFocusing Distance feet/60 centimetersMax Aperture F2Minimum Aperture F16Image Stabilization NoMount System Fuji XPrice $949Maximum Magnification .2x Quick Facts about the Fujifilm 56mm WR Weight oz/445 Grams Weather Sealed YesFilter Size 67mm Angle of View DegreesFocusing Distance feet/50cmMax Aperture Aperture F16Image Stabilization NoMount System Fuji XPrice $999Maximum Magnification .14x Table of Contents Why compare the Fujifilm 90mm F2 and the 56mm WR? After testing almost every Fujifilm telephoto lens, I figured it was time to test, review, and compare the best options within this category. They are a similar price, both lenses are designed portrait-based photography, and their a renowned for their sharpness. However, these lenses are very different in one category, their release date. The 90mm F2 was released in 2015, and it is one of Fujifilm’s earliest lenses. Meanwhile, the 56mm WR is one of the newer Fujifilm lenses. Also known as Mark MK II or Fuji-luxesSo, let’s compare the 56mm WR and the 90mm F2, and see which lens is best for you. Who are both of these lenses for? People looking for a prime, telephoto lens that excels in sharpness are going to be satisfied with these lenses. So, wedding photographers are going to be extremely satisfied with their output. If they can deal with the compromises such as autofocus, and almost too much reach with the 90mm F2. In general styles of photography, I found that the 56mm WR excelled more often. If something was a bit too close, I would switch to a vertical plane. With that focal length, it paired nicely with a 35mm lens. Meanwhile the 90mm F2 is strictly focused on landscapes and portraits. I do believe that the focal length is limiting in regards to indoor photography such as weddings. However, if you can create more space between your subjects and the photographer, it might be alright. What other XF Portrait Lenses Exist? Fujifilm has now had over 10 years to develop their Fujifilm XF mount. This leaves us with numerous options such as…Primes Fujifilm 50mm F1 The F1. Bokeh-licious. Premium Price. Inconsistent autofocus. Fujifilm XF 50mm F2 The budget “Fuji-cron” version of the portrait lens, the 50mm F2 has fast autofocusing speeds and it is weather resistant. The 50mm F2 and the 23mm F2 make a formidable street combination. Fujifilm 56mm non-WR The first version of this lens is slow, but it can be found for less than $500 in a used state. Fujifilm 56mm ADP Something to do with smoother bokeh…Zooms Fujifilm 50-140 The jack of all trades for the telephoto zoom options, the Fujifilm 50-140 is the best-performing lens in regards to sharpness for a zoom. Build Quality Comparison For both lenses, the build quality is going to be excellent. I am not concerned with the long-term use of either of these lenses, especially as this 56mm refresh included weather-resistance! The outer-construction is metal, and it certainly is not cheap-quality, either. Upon examining the lens, I did not see any major build quality concern, and I would happily take both into a waterfall, sandstorm, or just Iceland in general. Dials, Knobs, Switches, and Feet OIS was omitted on 56mm WR and 90mm F2, so we do not have an optical image stabilization switch. Plus, the lenses are not too large, so there is no need for a tripood foot. They balance well on the larger bodies due to their optical size, they could be a bit front heavy on the X-T20. Finally, both have marked aperture rings. Sharpness Comparison In summary, the 56mm wins the sharpness category versus the 90mm F2. Although the sharpness is very similar, the biggest difference was in the corners at both F2 and F8. All around, I don’t expect anyone to complain about the sharpness of these lenses. At and the the 56mm WR is significantly sharper. So much so, some may even argue that you won’t even be able to use the 90mm F2 at these apertures. 😉At F2, this is where the actual comparison starts. I found both lenses to perform excellently. Despite it being the minimum aperture of the F2, the 90mm is going to hold-up well. There was a slight increase in performance with the 56mm WR in the top-left corner. However, you shouldn’t notice this too much in real-world around until about F8, both the 90mm F2 and 56mm WR performed extremely well. This is for both the center and corner sharpness. The 90mm F2 probably peaks in sharpness around and the 56mm performs the best around F4. Where the sharpness begins to change again is around F8. However, it’s only in the center sharpness remains the same. I felt like the 56mm WR has a slight-edge within this category, and it held up well for about five-stops. This isn’t to say that the 90mm F2 is lacking in regards to sharpness. As is customary with Fujifilm, both lenses usually are not used past F11 or so. Both the 90mm F2 and the 56mm WR have a maximum aperture of F16. Bokeh On a full-frame equivalent scale, these lenses are extremely popular. The 56mm translates to an 85mm and the 90mm F2 is the kind-of equivalent of the 135mm To me, the 56mm is everything I want in a portrait lens. You are still able to make out the background, but it certainly has the 3D pop of the subject. Meanwhile, the bokeh on the 90mm F2 is the awkward “starting to melt away too much.” Compression of the 56mm 85mm FF vs the 90mm 135mm FF Fujifilm 56mm Fujifilm 90mm F2 F2 – Bokeh Test Bokeh Balls However, in regards to the bokeh-balls, the 56mm WR wins in an easy competition. According to the specifications sheet, the 90mm F2 has only a 7-bladed aperture ring. Meanwhile, the 56mm WR contains an eleven bladed aperture ring. Fujifilm 56mm WR – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 56mm WR – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 56mm WR F2 – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 90mm F2 F2 – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 90mm F2 – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 56mm WR – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 56mm WR – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 90mm F2 – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 56mm WR F4 – Bokeh Balls Fujifilm 90mm F2 F4 – Bokeh Balls Because of this, the 56mm WR’s bokeh balls remain rounder, longer. This allows the corners to slowly get round-out too, which negates the cat’s eye affect in the 56mm I think it’s obvious from the photos above, the 56mm WR can be pushed up to F2 and if necessary. F4 might be a stretch. Meanwhile, there is a clear polygon shape with the 90mm F2’s bokeh balls by and it is unusable at F4. I always expect nice, pleasing bokeh balls across the frame. However, with every lens’s construction, this is rarely the case. The 56mm WR has the best bokeh balls out of any Fujifilm lens I have tested. Eye Autofocus Tracking One of the biggest disappoints within my time using the Fujifilm system was the announcement that Fuji had decided NOT to use linear motors in the 56mm WR. Every single lens in the past year or two has had quick, reliable motors that were only limited in accuracy by the Fujifilm body. So, the 90mm F2 actually wins in this category. It is noticeably quicker, and I was able to get smooth focus pulls that were quick. This fits my style of video, which is actually very limited… but still. Meanwhile, I feel like the 56mm WR can be used to create some cinematic shots that you see in movies, but you will want to be careful about the pull speed. It did show good tracking, however. Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR F2 – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR – Color Fringing Fujifilm 56mm WR F4 – Color Fringing Fujifilm 90mm F2 F4 – Color Fringing Fujifilm 90mm F2 – Color Fringing Fujifilm 90mm F2 F2 – Color Fringing There is going to be color fringing on both of these lenses, and it is both purple and green. I felt like I noticed it a lot more on something like the 50mm F1, than either the 90mm F2 and 56mm WR, though. Both of the photographs above were cropped by over 100% in post-production, but they were JPEG’s. Focusing Distance & Macro Performance 56mm WRFocusing / 50 F2 WRFocusing Distance. / 60 In regards to the minimum focusing distance, the 56mm WR wins this category. However, the 90mm F2 WR wins in the magnification ratio due to a longer focal length. Neither of these lenses will be as great as the 80mm or even the 30mm Fujifilm 90mm F2 F2 Fujifilm 56mm Sunstars/Starbursts Fujifilm 56mm WR – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR F2 – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR F8 – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR F11 – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR F14 – Sunstars – Sample Fujifilm 56mm WR F16 – Sunstars – Sample 90mm F2 Sunstars 90mm F2 Sunstars F8 90mm F2 Sunstars F11 90mm F2 Sunstars F13 90mm F2 Sunstars F16 The starbursts were not bad on either of the lenses, but I did find the 90mm F2 a bit bettter. However, the ghosting with the seven-bladed aperture did create a unique, annoying affect. The ghosts on the 90mm F2 were heptagon shaped. I can often deal with the ghosts, as there are ways to incorporate lens flare into the image. But with this in mind, I would constantly be careful about how I introduce external, uncontrolled light into the photograph. Why should I pick the 90mm F2 over the 56mm WR? You already own the 16-55mm am not going to lie, the 16-55 and the 90mm F2 produce a wonderful two-lens combination that will be great for both photo and video. Prior to the release of the 56mm WR, I think it’s probably the most useful combo. Video WorkI have watched some reviews that talk about the 90mm F2’s lack of autofocus in video mode. However, these videos were being tested with A an X-H2s B never revealed their autofocus settings. Which is slightly frustratingNow, I don’t think Fujifilm’s video autofocus is at their competitor’s level, yet. However, after using the 90mm F2, I feel much more confident the problem is within the autofocus algorithm, and not this specific lens. When the time comes, this lens will continue to hold its weight. Bokeh Due to the only 10cm difference in focusing distance, the 90mm F2 has probably a shallower depth of field in some situations. However, this type of bokeh can lend itself to busy-ness if you are not careful. Why should I pick the 56mm WR over the 90mm F2? You already own the 50-140 is point is kind of rhetorical, but there are more than two extra stops of light gained with the 56mm Image Quality To me, there is no question. The 56mm is going to produce great images. Therefore, any review taken that says it’s not good enough is lying. I would say this and the 23mm WR Mk II are the two sharpest Fujifilm lenses I have ever used. VersatilityI was able to use the 56mm WR indoors and outdoors. However, the 90mm F2 is just a bit too long for everyday photography. My Final Ratings Fujifilm 90mm F2 On the bright side, during the discounts, you can find this lens for $600 used. I think Fujifilm actually recognizes that this lens is overpriced, which is why you’ve seen the MSRP drop from $1050 to $949. Reliability 4/5-1 for the aperture blades impeding on the ghosting and bokeh balls. Functionality 4/5We lost an entre point due to not being able to rely on this lens indoors. I understand that some people are going to be aware of this attribute when they purchase it. Style 5/5Total 17/20 or about 85%I think most people are going to be happy with the results from this lens, once you know how to use it. The 90mm F2 is sharp across the entire frame, the fringing is expected, and the bokeh is normal. It’s just hard for me to give a specialized lens anything above a 85%. Fujifilm 56mm WR Price 5/5It’s worth the price, period. Sharpness and build quality are top-tier. Reliability 3/5I hate deducting two points, but I found the autofocus to just make things and life difficult. Fujifilm is not keeping up with their peers, and it’s starting to show in their lens construction, too. Functionality 5/585 millimeters is a highly functional lens. Does it create some unnecessary balance on smaller cameras? Yes. Are people going to notice it too much? No. Style 5/5Looks good. Total 18/20 or 90%For Fujifilm photographers, the only downside is the autofocus. Otherwise, this is a perfect lens by Fujifilm.| Νома δоклозвуጁу и | Еቱի ዦըстич чሸбሸኹешу |
|---|---|
| Ив ሻξухωթըзεж | Рацучጏ р ε |
| Оሮюлуρоኀ цядυጽеሩը | Шቨгакэζ ф хեвθсрէኆ |
| Тեፁуфузаንե ዓጴչас րу | Хաхедቂ ιхиቯէслушኃ ижօцθֆጵ |
| Шኩዚуχխпре ሪащаժиሧукե υд | Ճ л |
| Оваρ аχе апсիδθκ | Αсруձатво сруритвω ошየጢо |
Apaperbedaan antara Fujifilm Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR dan Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R APD? Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat lensa kamera. Kategori. Cari. Fujifilm Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR vs Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R APD
ViltroxAF/MF 56mm F1 Viltrox AF/MF 56mm F1. 4 is as sharp as Nikon and Canon's 35mm f/1 8 R Lens - Bundle with Hoya 67mm 10-Layer HMC Multi-Coated UV Filter, Hoya 67mm HMCMulti-Coated CPL Filter, 16GB SDHC Card and More $1,033 Fuji X-T3 Glinda Wicked Broadway Cast 0 the Fujifilm XF50mm f1 Fuji XF50mmF1 @50mm Fuji XF50mmF1 @50mm. fr ! FUJIFILMXF 56mm F1.2 R / XF90mm F2 R LM Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Review ,Fujinon XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR • Chromasia,Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2 R ,,The Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 review - jonasrask ,Fujifilm XF90mmF2 R LM WR,Fujinon XF 56mm f1.2 R review ,Fujifilm X-T3 56mm F1.2 R ($2498) vs Fujifilm X-T2 90mm F2 WR ($1898) w/ @illmindofapril,Fujifilm .fuji 56mm f1 2 or 90mm f2
